BigDaddy News

Cricket News

Border-Gavaskar Trophy: Sunil Gavaskar explains what can take the load off Jasprit Bumrah | Cricket News

Sunil Gavaskar explains what can take the load off Jasprit Bumrah
Jasprit Bumrah and Sunil Gavaskar. (Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)

NEW DELHI: The current Test team, according to legendary Indian batsman Sunil Gavaskar, is mostly dependent on fast bowling star Jasprit Bumrah to lead the bowling assault.
With 12 wickets from two games, Bumrah is now the most prolific wicket-taker in the ongoing Border-Gavaskar Trophy series. However, Bumrah hasn’t had much help from the other Indian fast bowlers; Nitish Kumar Reddy and Harshit Rana have each claimed five and two wickets, while Mohammed Siraj has taken nine.
“Yes, to a great extent. You’ve got to say that. Mohammed Siraj is a good foil, but he has to start getting five wickets in an innings. Otherwise, the load is being picked up mainly by Jasprit Bumrah.

India’s over dependence on Jasprit Bumrah visible in Adelaide

“But if Siraj can pick up two, three wickets, keep on breaking partnerships, then he certainly helps Jasprit Bumrah. Harshit Rana, the newcomer, bowled impressively in Perth, wasn’t as impressive in the second game at Adelaide.
“Maybe he just couldn’t find his rhythm, therefore was not bowling the length that he should have, or the line that he should have. But hopefully he will have learned. And then that makes it easy. It takes the load off Bumrah. Bumrah can then come in, in short bursts of four or five overs, and be much more effective,” said Gavaskar to Star Sports.
After Ravichandran Ashwin played in the second game in Adelaide but only took one wicket of Mitchell Marsh and did little with the bat, former off-spinner Harbhajan Singh suggested that Washington Sundar should be given a chance to be India’s spinner for the third Test, which begins in Brisbane on December 14.
“If we have to play a spinner, I think Team India will look back at Washington Sundar. Because he played well in Perth and his bowling was also good. He has performed very well in front of New Zealand also. So, he must have felt confident too,” he added.
Veteran batter Cheteshwar Pujara agreed with Harbhajan’s views. “There can be only one change. Washington can replace Ashwin if they want to strengthen their batting. There is no comparison in bowling. Ashwin is a very good bowler. But if they want a little more strength in batting, they can play Washington.”
But veteran leg-spinner Piyush Chawla thinks Ashwin should be retained for the Brisbane Test. “The way Ashwin has played in the second test match, he kept them in check. He played very well. He conceded 50 runs in 18 overs and took one wicket. So, there is no need to change. Because after losing one test match, if you think so much about it, it becomes difficult.”
When it comes to the Indian team’s playing eleven lineup, former wicketkeeper-batter Deep Dasgupta believed that consistency was crucial. “Washington in the first test match and Ashwin in the second test match. Is there a need for so many changes? I don’t think there is a need.
“They have done it. They brought Ashwin in the second test match. But don’t do it again. If you want to get the best out of the player, you have to give him security. And I think, in that sense, I would like to continue with Ashwin in this Test match.”

Leave feedback about this

  • Quality
  • Price
  • Service

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image
Choose Video

Want To Earn From Skills ?

10%
Bonus On New ID

NO DOCUMENTATION,NO KYC REQUIRED